How Facebook Moderates Content

How Facebook Moderates Content



Although this video is over two months old, it is still very instructive for anyone interested in learning how Facebook moderates content.  In the video, Professor Jonathan Zittrain of Harvard Law School interviews Monika Bickert, Facebook’s Head of Global Policy Management.


Social Media Accountability for Terrorist Propaganda

Alexander Tsesis


Social Media Accountability for Terrorist Propaganda


Terrorist organizations have found social media websites to be invaluable for disseminating ideology, recruiting terrorists, and planning operations. National and international leaders have repeatedly pointed out the dangers terrorists pose to ordinary people and state institutions. In the United States, the federal Communications Decency Act’s Section 230 provides social networking websites with immunity against civil law suits. Litigants have therefore been unsuccessful in obtaining redress against internet companies who host or disseminate third-party terrorist content. This Article demonstrates that Section 230 does not bar private parties from recovery if they can prove that a social media company had received about specific webpages, videos, posts, articles, IP addresses, or accounts of foreign terrorist organizations; the company’s failure to remove the material; a terrorist’s subsequent viewing of or interacting with the material on the website; and that terrorist’s acting upon the propaganda to harm the plaintiff.

This Article argues that irrespective of civil immunity, the First Amendment does not limit Congress’s authority to impose criminal liability on those content intermediaries who have been notified that their websites are hosting third-party foreign terrorist incitement, recruitment, or instruction. Neither the First Amendment nor the Communications Decency Act prevents this form of federal criminal prosecution. A social media company can be prosecuted for material support of terrorism if it is knowingly providing a platform to organizations or individuals who advocate the commission of terrorist acts. Mechanisms will also need to be created that can enable administrators to take emergency measures, while simultaneously preserving the due process rights of internet intermediaries to challenge orders to immediately block, temporarily remove, or permanently destroy data.

Judges and Social Media


Judges and Social Media

I, along with Cynthia Gray from the National Center for State Courts, will be speaking about the impact of social media on judges this Thursday at the Michigan Judicial Institute. Here is a brief description of my presentation. To view the entire program go here.

2:45 – 4:00 p.m. (General session for all participants)

Best Practices and Safety Tips: Everything I Wished I Knew Regarding Social Media Before Clicking

Faculty: Ms. Cynthia Gray, Center for Judicial Ethics, National Center for State Courts; Professor Thaddeus Hoffmeister, University of Dayton School of Law

A session to present do’s, don’ts, and maybe’s regarding a judicial officer’s use of Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Blogs and how to manage social media use in the courtroom by jurors, lawyers, defendants and victims.

Holding Social Media Providers Liable for the Acts of Third Parties

Holding Social Media Providers Liable for the Acts of Third Parties

As I explain in the article below, it is very difficult to hold social media providers liable for the acts of third parties even if those third parties are terrorists. Lawyer takes on Google, Facebook, Twitter over terror videos

CBS Lawyer Loses Job Over Callous Facebooks Post


CBS Lawyer Loses Job Over Callous Facebooks Post CBS fires lawyer over Facebook posts calling Vegas shooting victims likely ‘Republican gun toters’

CBS has fired vice president and senior counsel Hayley Geftman-Gold because of Facebook comments under her name that said she had no sympathy for the victims of late Sunday’s mass shooting in Las Vegas that killed dozens and injured hundreds at a country music continue reading go here.

DHS Wants Immigrants Social Media History


DHS Wants Immigrants Social Media History Homeland Security plans to collect immigrants’ social media info

SESTA and Start-Ups

SESTA and Start-Ups

This article argues that large internet companies like Google and Facebook will most likely survive any changes imposed by the Stop Enabling Sex Trafficker’s Act (SESTA) which is currently being considered by the U.S. Senate.  However, new start-ups hoping to get into the field will have a much more difficult time in light of the requirements imposed by SESTA.  As some are aware, SESTA will erode the traditional 230 immunity provided to internet companies for the actions of third parties.

According to the article,

“[m]any of SESTA’s supporters suggest that it would be easy for web platforms of all sizes to implement automated filtering technologies they can trust to separate legitimate voices from criminal ones. But it’s impossible to do that with anywhere near 100% accuracy. Given the extreme penalties for under-filtering, platforms would err in the opposite direction, removing legitimate voices from the Internet. As EFF Executive Director Cindy Cohn put it, “Again and again, when platforms clamp down on their users’ speech, marginalized voices are the first to disappear.”” Google Will Survive SESTA. Your Start-Up Might Not.

Blog Stats

  • 6,173 hits
Follow LawandSocialMedia on

Top Clicks

  • None

Criminal Law